bet9ja.com
Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting ban?
bet9ja.com
By Natalie Sherman
Business press reporter, New york city
A ban on sports betting wagering in a lot of US states might be reversed by a case being considered by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that mainly forbade sports betting gambling, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" issue.
The case, which began on Monday, follows New Jersey locals enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes sports betting on games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.
Lower courts have regularly ruled versus New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to limit a state's policy alternatives.
The Supreme Court chose to hear the case however in the middle of a larger shift in American mindsets toward gambling.
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal casinos outside Native American lands.
But over the last few years, states starving for tax income in the wake of the monetary crash have enacted a rash of looser gambling laws, collecting hefty levies on gambling earnings.
There are now 24 states with industrial gambling establishments - roughly double the number a years earlier.
Despite the main ban, which currently exempts Nevada and 3 other states, unlawful sports betting is swarming in the US.
Americans place about $154bn in prohibited sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, explained the federal restriction, external as an "utter failure" previously this year.
It says the UK is an example of a country where sports betting wagering is prevalent.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of vital tax earnings and enable them to enjoy the benefits of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.
More than 15 states submitted papers in support of New Jersey in the event. A handful have already passed laws to authorise sports betting wagering in case of a change.
'Times have altered'
On Monday, as attorneys began for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is expected to decide in June 2018.
"If we achieve success here we could have bets being taken in New Jersey within 2 weeks of a decision by the court," stated outbound New Jersey guv Chris Christie after going to the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're all set to go."
Despite the court's final judgment, Congress might also use up the dispute in the middle of broader discussion about online video gaming and e-sports betting.
Even some of the professional sports betting leagues have started to alter their positions on the concern of gaming.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would create an uniform set of rules across the US. "Times have changed," he wrote in a 2014 opinion piece, external.
Addicts battling with mobile wagering
3 October 2017
bit.ly
The challenging issue of issue sports betting
31 August 2017
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the US Sports Betting Ban?
alexandriavzm edited this page 1 year ago